Best LMS with Reporting & Analytics in 2026

Enrollment counts and revenue totals are the easy numbers every platform shows you. The harder, more useful reporting answers questions like which specific courses are underperforming relative to their enrollment, what your actual revenue breakdown looks like between platform and instructor share, and whether you can export any of this data to actually work with it rather than just look at it inside wp-admin.

Individual student progress, drip scheduling, and course prerequisites are each their own comparison in this series: our look at LMS drip scheduling, our comparison of course prerequisite depth, and a separate look at how the two work together to sequence a multi-course learning path. This guide asks a different question: once a student is enrolled and moving through a course, what does the business actually get to see about how it’s performing? We compared eight platforms specifically on business-level reporting depth: revenue breakdown, course-level completion transparency, and whether the underlying data can leave wp-admin in a genuinely usable format.

Reporting sounds like a back-office detail until a course business tries to answer a board-level question with it: which course should get more marketing spend, which instructor should get a bigger cut on the next contract renewal, whether last quarter’s enrollment bump actually turned into finished students. A platform that only shows enrollment and revenue can answer none of those questions with any confidence. The eight platforms below are judged on whether their reporting actually answers them.

How we evaluated

None of the criteria below is about which plan or tier a feature happens to live in. We looked specifically at what the reporting screen itself shows, and whether the data it shows can actually be trusted and used.

• Completion transparency: Does the dashboard surface a real per-course completion percentage, including the low ones, or only enrollment and revenue?
• Revenue breakdown: Is platform share separated from instructor share directly, or does that require reconstructing the number from a payout log?
• Export usability: Can revenue, students, and courses be exported independently, in a format that opens cleanly in a spreadsheet?
• Reporting period flexibility: Is there a real date-range selector, or only a single fixed all-time view?
• Data portability: Can the underlying numbers leave wp-admin, through an export or an API, for a school that wants its own dashboard?
• Fit for the business model: Does reporting extend to subscription-specific metrics if the school runs memberships rather than one-time course sales?

Quick comparison

Platform	Revenue Breakdown Reporting	Top-Courses Performance View	CSV/PDF Export	Reporting Availability
Learnomy	Yes, platform/instructor split	Yes, with completion % per course	Yes, CSV and PDF	Native, included in the base platform
LearnDash	Yes, via ProPanel	Yes	Yes	ProPanel depth requires a higher subscription tier
Sensei LMS	Basic, WooCommerce-adjacent	Limited	Limited	Deeper analytics reserved for its top usage tier
Tutor LMS	Reasonable	Yes	Yes	Native, included in the base plugin
LifterLMS	Reasonable	Yes	Yes	Native, included in the core plugin
WP Courseware	Detailed student reporting, less revenue-focused	Limited	Yes	Native, included in the base plugin
MemberPress Courses	Revenue reporting via membership engine	Limited	Yes	Native, tied to the membership engine
Thinkific	Yes	Yes	Yes	Native, included across its hosted plans

1. Learnomy, honest reporting, including the numbers that don’t look good

The most telling detail about Learnomy’s Analytics dashboard isn’t a feature list, it’s what it’s willing to show. A Top Courses table lists real per-course completion percentages alongside enrollment and revenue, including the low ones, rather than only showing enrollment and revenue, the numbers that always look good. A platform willing to surface an unflattering completion rate clearly is doing something most competitors’ dashboards don’t.

Revenue reporting built around who actually gets paid

The Revenue Breakdown panel splits Platform Share from Instructor Share directly, connecting to the commission system covered elsewhere in this series, alongside Total Revenue, Transaction count, and Average Order Value. A reporting period selector (7/30/90 days/1 year) lets you view this at different time horizons rather than being stuck with a single flattened all-time number, useful for spotting whether a course’s revenue is trending up or quietly fading after a launch spike. An Export Data section offers both CSV and PDF for Revenue, Students, and Courses independently, genuinely usable for taking the data into a spreadsheet rather than being locked inside the admin screen.

Built on the same course structure it measures

The per-course completion percentages in the Top Courses table are only meaningful because each lesson is tracked as its own unit rather than folded into a single course-level checkbox. Learnomy’s front-end drag-and-drop course builder treats every video, audio, PDF, and reading lesson as an individually trackable step, so a low completion rate for a specific course reflects actual lesson-by-lesson progress across real students rather than a single all-or-nothing flag that could hide exactly where people stop.

Completion numbers that hold up because grading does

A completion percentage is only as trustworthy as what counts as “complete,” and that’s where the gradebook closes the loop. It rolls each course’s quizzes, assignments, and SCORM packages into a single weighted grade with a defined pass mark, so a course marked complete in the Analytics dashboard reflects an actual passing grade rather than a checkbox for having opened every lesson once. That’s part of why a low completion number is worth taking seriously rather than dismissing as a tracking quirk: the number is built on the same graded data an instructor already trusts to hand out a certificate.

Reporting depth for a subscription-driven school

For a school running memberships rather than one-time course sales, the platform’s deeper capability tier extends the same Analytics dashboard with subscription-specific metrics, monthly recurring revenue, churn, and lifetime value, broken out by retention cohort, so a business built around trials and recurring billing isn’t left reconstructing those numbers by hand in a spreadsheet. The core dashboard described above, revenue split, per-course completion, and CSV/PDF export, doesn’t require stepping up to see it.

Reporting data isn’t sealed inside wp-admin

Learnomy ships with more than 160 REST endpoints across courses, enrollments, and revenue, so the numbers behind the dashboard aren’t only presentable inside a single wp-admin screen. That matters for a school that wants to pull its own enrollment, revenue, and completion data into an external dashboard or finance tool rather than reading every number one wp-admin page at a time. Go deeper: Know Exactly Who’s Learning and Who’s Stuck covers the full Analytics dashboard, the real completion percentages, and the revenue breakdown in detail with real screenshots.

Migrating an existing analytics gap

Learnomy ships a migration wizard for LearnDash, Tutor LMS, and LifterLMS, covering existing lessons, quizzes, and enrollments, so a school moving from one of those three specifically to gain this reporting depth doesn’t have to rebuild its course library from scratch to get there.

---

2. LearnDash, strong analytics, in ProPanel specifically

LearnDash’s ProPanel add-on delivers genuinely capable reporting: completion, top-course, and earnings charts with CSV/Excel export, by its own documentation. This is a real strength once a school is on the subscription tier that includes it. LearnDash’s entry-level tier ships with more basic reporting, so the completion and earnings-chart depth described above isn’t necessarily what a school sees on day one before stepping up. For a business specifically prioritizing revenue and completion reporting, confirm which tier is actually being evaluated before assuming ProPanel-level detail is included by default.

3. Tutor LMS, reasonable reporting without a dedicated deep-dive tier

Tutor LMS offers reasonable revenue and course-performance reporting adequate for a mid-sized course business, with export options covering the common use cases and a front-end instructor dashboard that surfaces the numbers without a trip into wp-admin. What it doesn’t have is a dedicated deep-dive analytics layer comparable to LearnDash’s ProPanel: the reporting that exists is native to the base plugin rather than gated behind a specialized add-on, which is convenient, but a school that wants subscription-specific metrics or a genuinely granular completion breakdown per lesson should confirm the depth directly rather than assuming it matches a dedicated analytics product.

4. LifterLMS, solid reporting baked into the core plugin

LifterLMS bakes reasonable revenue and course-performance reporting directly into the core plugin rather than requiring a separate purchase to unlock it, which matches its broader pattern of keeping access rules, memberships, and reporting as native parts of the same product. Course-performance and export options both hold up for a mid-sized business. The tradeoff shows up in depth rather than availability: LifterLMS’s reporting is solid and native, but it doesn’t reach the same completion-percentage granularity per lesson that Learnomy’s Top Courses view surfaces, or the earnings-chart depth of LearnDash’s ProPanel, so a school specifically prioritizing reporting depth over reporting availability should weigh that difference directly.

5. Thinkific, hosted reporting with a structural caveat

Thinkific’s reporting is genuinely solid: revenue breakdown, course performance, and export all check out across its plans, comparable to what Tutor LMS and LifterLMS offer. The structural difference is where that data actually lives. Thinkific is a hosted platform rather than a WordPress plugin, so the reporting, and the underlying student and revenue data behind it, sits on Thinkific’s infrastructure rather than a database you control. Export works, but the reporting itself only exists inside Thinkific’s admin, not inside a site you own and can query, back up, or extend on your own terms.

6. WP Courseware, strong on students, lighter on revenue

WP Courseware specifically markets detailed student reporting as a core strength, individual progress, quiz attempts, and completion status per student are genuinely well covered, but its revenue-and-business-level analytics are less developed by comparison. A course-performance view exists, but it leans toward showing who did what rather than how a course is performing financially against its enrollment. That’s a real strength in one direction and a real gap in the other: a school that mostly needs to answer “is this specific student stuck” will find WP Courseware’s reporting more than adequate, while a school that needs a platform/instructor revenue split or a genuine top-courses financial view should look elsewhere on this list.

7. Sensei, reporting behind its top tier

Sensei’s analytics are described even in its own tier structure as needing its top usage tier for deeper reporting, with its core and mid-tier plans offering a more basic view. Because Sensei is built to sit close to WooCommerce, its revenue reporting leans WooCommerce-adjacent rather than course-native, useful if a business already lives inside WooCommerce’s reporting for everything else, less useful as a standalone course-analytics view. Course-performance and export both land on the limited side compared to the rest of this list, which fits Sensei’s broader positioning as a course add-on to an existing WooCommerce store rather than a reporting-first learning platform.

8. MemberPress Courses, reporting tied to membership billing

MemberPress’s reporting is oriented around its membership-and-billing engine rather than course-specific performance analytics. Revenue reporting is genuinely solid, because it inherits directly from MemberPress’s subscription and payment reporting, but that reporting answers “how is this membership performing” more naturally than “how is this specific course performing.” Course-performance and completion views are limited by comparison, which makes sense for a plugin whose core identity is membership management with courses layered on top, rather than a course platform with membership as a secondary feature.

---

Why an honest completion percentage matters more than a flattering revenue chart

It’s worth being direct about why this comparison weights honest, uncomfortable reporting over polished-looking dashboards. Revenue and enrollment numbers can make a course business look healthy while completion rates sit in the single digits, meaning most paying customers never actually got the outcome they paid for. A reporting system that surfaces this clearly, rather than emphasizing only the numbers that flatter the business, is the one that actually helps you fix real problems rather than just feel good about vanity metrics.

This matters most for a school that’s scaling. A single instructor running one course can often sense, informally, whether students are actually finishing, by watching forum activity or answering emails directly. A multi-instructor catalog with dozens of courses loses that informal signal entirely; the only way to know a specific course has a completion problem is a dashboard that actually says so, in a number rather than a vague impression. Enrollment growth and revenue growth can both look fine for months while a completion problem quietly compounds, refund requests rising, reviews softening, word-of-mouth drying up, long before the revenue chart itself shows any sign of it.

There’s also a practical business reason to want this number, beyond simple honesty. A course with a genuinely low completion rate is usually fixable: the lesson sequence might be too long, a specific module might be where students consistently drop off, or the course might need a restructured onboarding lesson at the start. None of that is diagnosable from a revenue chart alone. A reporting system that names the specific course and the specific percentage turns a vague sense that “something feels off” into an actual, testable hypothesis an instructor can act on this week rather than guess at for another quarter.

Buying criteria: what actually matters

None of the criteria below is about which plan a feature happens to live in. Match the platform to what the business actually needs to see, not to a dashboard screenshot in a sales page.

• Does the revenue view split platform share from instructor share directly? A multi-instructor catalog needs this as a native number, not something reconstructed from a separate payout log.
• Does a top-courses view show completion percentage, not just enrollment and revenue? Enrollment-only numbers hide whether students are actually finishing what they paid for.
• Can revenue, students, and courses be exported independently, and does the export open cleanly? Test an actual export in Excel or Google Sheets before assuming it’s board-report-ready.
• Is there a flexible reporting-period selector, or only a fixed all-time view? A single flattened number hides seasonal patterns and post-launch decay that a date-range view would catch immediately.
• Does per-instructor revenue reporting exist directly, or does it need to be pieced together from payout records? Worth confirming before a second or third instructor joins the catalog.
• Is the underlying data reachable through an export or an API, or locked entirely inside wp-admin? A school that wants its own dashboard, or wants to hand numbers to a bookkeeper without a screen-share, needs a way to get data out.
• Does reporting extend to subscription-specific metrics if the business model shifts? A course business that adds memberships later benefits from a platform whose reporting already accounts for churn and retention rather than only one-time sales.
• Is deeper reporting native to the base plugin, or does it require a separate add-on or a higher subscription tier? Confirm this directly before assuming a demo’s dashboard is what ships on the plan you’re actually evaluating.

Not every business needs every item on this list with equal urgency. A solo instructor running two courses cares most about completion transparency and export usability; a multi-instructor academy cares most about the revenue split and per-instructor reporting; a corporate training program cares most about cohort-level completion and data portability into whatever system already tracks employee training records. Rank the list against the business in front of you before ranking the platforms against each other.

Common mistakes when reading LMS reporting

Most of the reporting problems we’ve seen on real course businesses trace back to one of these six habits, not to a platform missing a feature entirely.

1. Treating enrollment and revenue as the whole picture. Both can look healthy for months while completion quietly falls apart underneath them. Completion rate is the number that actually tells you whether students are getting an outcome.
2. Assuming CSV export means spreadsheet-ready. Open an exported file in Excel or Google Sheets and check it directly before relying on it for a board report or a bookkeeper handoff.
3. Reading total revenue without checking the platform/instructor split. On a multi-instructor catalog, a single revenue total hides who is actually earning what, and can mask an instructor being underpaid or overpaid by a commission-calculation error.
4. Ignoring the reporting-period selector. A single all-time number flattens seasonal patterns and post-launch decay. Check month over month before trusting a flat trend line.
5. Not testing per-instructor reporting before onboarding a second teacher. Some platforms reconstruct this from a payout log rather than showing it directly on a dashboard, worth confirming ahead of time rather than after a dispute.
6. Choosing a platform based on a demo’s polished dashboard rather than its real completion data. A dashboard that only surfaces enrollment and revenue can look reassuring while hiding a completion problem. Ask specifically to see a genuine completion percentage before deciding.

FAQ

Availability reality across all eight platforms

Learnomy’s core Analytics dashboard, revenue split, per-course completion, and independent CSV/PDF export, is native to the base platform, with a deeper capability tier adding subscription-specific metrics: monthly recurring revenue, churn, and retention broken out by cohort, on top of the standard reporting. LearnDash’s ProPanel reporting is gated behind its higher subscription tiers, so the completion, top-course, and earnings-chart depth described above isn’t part of its entry-level plan. Sensei reserves its most advanced analytics for its top usage tier, with its core and mid-tier plans offering a more basic view. Tutor LMS, LifterLMS, WP Courseware, MemberPress Courses, and Thinkific all include reasonable reporting as a native part of their respective base plans, without the same dramatically deeper paid-analytics tier that LearnDash and Sensei reserve for a higher spend.

Verdict

For reporting that includes honest, sometimes uncomfortable numbers alongside the flattering ones, with a clear platform/instructor revenue split and genuinely usable CSV/PDF export natively in the base platform, Learnomy is the strongest option we verified directly in this comparison. LearnDash’s ProPanel delivers comparable depth once you’re on the tier that includes it. Tutor LMS, LifterLMS, and Thinkific all offer solid, adequate reporting for a mid-sized business, and Thinkific’s sits on hosted infrastructure rather than a site you control. WP Courseware, Sensei, and MemberPress Courses are each more limited specifically on business-level revenue and course-performance analytics, whatever else they do well. And if the reporting need is part of a larger sequencing problem, a multi-course program with its own drip schedule and prerequisite chain, our comparison of drip content and prerequisites working together is the more relevant read.

One more practical note for anyone building this comparison into a bigger decision: reporting rarely gets evaluated on its own. A school choosing a platform is usually also weighing course-building workflow, checkout, certificates, and how a multi-course curriculum gets sequenced. If sequencing is the more urgent question right now, drip scheduling and course prerequisites, working together, are covered directly in the comparison linked above; reporting depth is worth revisiting once that structural decision is settled, since the two rarely change which platform wins on their own.