25 Best Product Design Tools for 2026

Table of Contents

Product design in 2026 is a team sport played across multiple disciplines, tools, and time zones. A designer’s daily stack might span wireframing in the morning, high-fidelity UI work through the afternoon, a quick prototype review with engineering in a different country, and a user testing session that informs the next sprint’s priorities before the day ends. The tools that support this workflow have evolved dramatically, AI-assisted design, real-time collaboration, integrated handoff, and no-code prototyping have all moved from experimental to mainstream in the past two years.

The product design tooling landscape has also diversified significantly. Where Figma once dominated the conversation almost entirely, the category now includes serious competition across every subcategory: specialized animation tools that produce production-ready code, 3D design platforms accessible to UI designers without 3D expertise, user testing tools that return insights in hours rather than weeks, and design system platforms that bridge the gap between design files and the component libraries that engineering teams actually use.

This guide covers all of it. We evaluated 25 of the best product design tools for 2026 across six categories: UI/UX design, prototyping and wireframing, motion and animation, 3D and web design, user research, and design operations. Each tool is assessed on its core capability, collaboration features, learning curve, integration with the broader design ecosystem, and 2026 pricing. Whether you are a solo product designer, a team of five working in a fast-growing startup, or a design leader managing a large organization’s design system, this guide helps you build the right stack for your specific context.

What to Look For in Product Design Tools

Collaboration as a Core Feature, Not an Add-On

Product design is inherently collaborative, between designers, between design and engineering, between design and product management, and between the team and end users. Tools that treat collaboration as a secondary feature, a share button, a comment thread, an export option, create friction that slows every handoff and review cycle. The best tools in 2026 are built collaboration-first: real-time multiplayer editing, contextual commenting tied to specific design elements, integrated design review flows, and developer handoff specs generated automatically without additional exports or plugin dependencies.

Component and Design System Support

At scale, product design lives and dies by its design system. Tools that support robust component libraries, shared, versioned, overridable components with consistent properties, save orders of magnitude more time than tools that require designers to manually maintain consistency. Evaluate not just whether a tool has components, but how well it handles nested components, component variants, design tokens, and the synchronization between the design system and the production component library in code.

Prototype Fidelity and Developer Handoff Quality

The gap between what a designer intends and what an engineer implements often comes down to prototype clarity and handoff quality. Evaluate both dimensions. A high-fidelity interactive prototype that communicates micro-interactions, transition states, loading states, and edge case behaviors reduces the number of back-and-forth clarification cycles during implementation. Developer handoff features, precise measurements, auto-generated CSS, export of assets in the right formats at the right sizes, directly reduce implementation time and interpretation errors.

AI Integration That Saves Time Without Replacing Judgment

AI features in product design tools have matured past the novelty phase. Generative AI that creates UI layouts from text prompts, AI that suggests component names and auto-categorizes design system elements, AI that identifies accessibility issues before handoff, and AI that generates copy variations for A/B testing are all genuinely useful when properly integrated. The warning sign is AI that overpromises, tools that claim to “design for you” rarely produce work that needs less revision than doing it manually. Look for AI that accelerates specific, well-defined tasks rather than attempting to replace the full design process.

Performance and Reliability at Scale

Design files grow. A file that starts with ten artboards becomes a hundred. A component library that starts with fifty components grows to five hundred. Design tools that perform well with small files but degrade significantly with complex, production-scale files create a productivity cliff that forces painful migrations at the worst possible moments. Test with files that approximate your expected complexity before committing to a tool for long-term use.

1. Figma

Best for: UI/UX design teams of any size, the current industry standard

Figma is the dominant product design tool in 2026, and for good reason. Its browser-based, real-time collaborative architecture fundamentally changed how design teams work, no more “who has the latest file” confusion, no version conflicts, and no need for VPN access to a shared drive. A designer in Berlin and a product manager in San Francisco can work in the same file simultaneously, with full cursor visibility and live updates. This collaboration model has become the baseline expectation for professional design tools.

The platform’s component and design system capabilities are industry-leading. Auto Layout, Figma’s constraint-based responsive layout system, allows components to behave like real UI elements, resizing and reordering content dynamically as properties change. Component variants let designers define all states of a component (default, hover, pressed, disabled, loading) in a single organized structure that makes handoff to engineers systematic rather than ad hoc.

Figma Variables (introduced in 2023 and significantly expanded since) bridge design tokens and production code. Designers can define color, spacing, typography, and border radius tokens in Figma and export them in formats that engineering teams can directly consume, eliminating the translation layer between design specifications and code implementation. For design systems at scale, this feature alone justifies Figma’s position as the default choice.

Figma AI, now deeply integrated across the platform, can generate UI layouts from text descriptions, rename layers intelligently, suggest auto layout application, translate text content across languages, and generate copy variations for testing. These features save meaningful time on repetitive tasks without attempting to replace design judgment on complex decisions.

Dev Mode, introduced in 2023 and continually improving, provides a dedicated engineering-focused view of Figma files, precise measurements, auto-generated code snippets in React, CSS, iOS, and Android, asset export in any format, and annotation tools for documenting design decisions. Dev Mode has effectively replaced the need for separate handoff tools like Zeplin for most teams.

• Real-time collaboration: True multiplayer editing with cursor presence, comments, and live updates
• Auto Layout + Variables: Constraint-based responsive components with design token support
• Component variants: All component states organized in a single, reusable structure
• Dev Mode: Engineering-focused view with code snippets, measurements, and asset export
• Figma AI: Layout generation, layer renaming, copy generation, and translation

Pricing (2026): Free (3 projects), Professional at $15/editor/month, Organization at $45/editor/month, Enterprise at $75/editor/month.

2. Adobe XD

Best for: Designers already in the Adobe Creative Cloud ecosystem

Adobe XD is Adobe’s UI/UX design and prototyping tool, tightly integrated with the Creative Cloud suite. For teams that rely on Photoshop, Illustrator, After Effects, and other Adobe products as part of their design workflow, XD provides the natural bridge, assets move between applications fluidly, Creative Cloud Libraries sync shared assets across tools, and Adobe Fonts are available directly in XD without additional licensing.

XD’s prototyping capabilities are solid for presenting user flows and transitions to stakeholders. Auto-Animate creates smooth transitions between artboards based on matching element positions and properties, a quick way to create polished presentation-ready prototypes without building frame-by-frame animations. Voice prototyping allows designers to add speech and sound triggers to prototypes, useful for teams designing voice-enabled products or accessibility-focused experiences.

Co-editing in XD allows multiple designers to work in the same document simultaneously, though the real-time collaboration experience is less seamless than Figma’s. Shared specs and developer handoff through XD’s spec view provide measurements, CSS, and asset export for engineering teams.

One important note for 2026: Adobe announced reduced investment in XD’s active development in late 2023, with Figma acquisition plans (later blocked) shifting strategy. Adobe has since refocused XD development, but the pace of feature releases has slowed relative to Figma and Framer. Teams evaluating XD should factor this roadmap uncertainty into their decision, particularly for long-term design system investments.

• Creative Cloud integration: Direct asset sharing with Photoshop, Illustrator, After Effects, and CC Libraries
• Auto-Animate: Smooth transition animations between artboards based on element matching
• Voice prototyping: Speech triggers and sound interactions for voice-enabled product design
• Co-editing: Multi-user simultaneous editing with shared cloud documents
• Repeat Grid: Quickly replicate and populate design elements with real content

Pricing (2026): Included in Adobe Creative Cloud All Apps at $54.99/month; standalone XD plan at $9.99/month.

3. Sketch

Best for: Mac-based design teams with established workflows and deep component libraries

Sketch was the tool that defined the modern UI design workflow before Figma’s rise, and it remains actively developed and genuinely capable, particularly for Mac-native teams with invested design systems. Sketch’s native Mac app delivers performance advantages over browser-based tools for complex files, and its plugin ecosystem, though smaller than it once was, remains extensive, with specialized tools for accessibility checking, design token management, and content population.

Sketch’s approach to symbols (the equivalent of Figma’s components) has been refined over many years and offers mature capabilities including nested symbol overrides, symbol resizing options, and library management across multiple files. Teams with large, established Sketch component libraries may find the migration cost to Figma significant enough that continued investment in Sketch remains justified.

Sketch Workspaces, the cloud collaboration layer, provides shared libraries, real-time collaboration (introduced in recent versions), and a web-based prototype viewer accessible to non-Sketch users. The collaboration experience is functional but still lags behind Figma’s native multiplayer model in terms of responsiveness and simultaneous editing smoothness.

Sketch’s pricing model changed significantly in recent years, from a one-time purchase to a subscription model, which caused friction for existing users but funds ongoing development. For new teams starting fresh, the one-time business case for Sketch over Figma is harder to make than it was five years ago, but for teams with deep legacy investments, Sketch remains a professional-grade choice.

• Native Mac performance: Superior file handling speed for complex documents compared to browser-based tools
• Symbols and libraries: Mature nested symbol system with extensive override capabilities
• Plugin ecosystem: Hundreds of plugins for specialized workflows, accessibility, and content management
• Sketch Workspaces: Cloud libraries, collaboration, and web prototype sharing
• Inspector: Detailed CSS output and measurement specifications for developer handoff

Pricing (2026): Standard at $10/editor/month (includes cloud); Business at $20/editor/month.

4. Framer

Best for: Designers who want production-quality interactive prototypes and no-code website publishing

Framer has undergone a remarkable transformation from a code-based prototyping tool into a design-to-web platform that produces real, publishable websites from visual design. In 2026, Framer occupies a unique position, it is simultaneously one of the best interactive prototyping tools available and a legitimate no-code website builder, with the same canvas producing both prototype experiences and live production sites.

The interactive capabilities in Framer are unmatched for fidelity. Variables, conditional logic, component states, physics-based animations, scroll-triggered effects, and live data connections allow designers to build prototypes that behave exactly like the production product, not a simulation, but an experience that stakeholders, user research participants, and engineers cannot meaningfully distinguish from the real application. This fidelity dramatically reduces the gap between design intent and stakeholder understanding.

Framer’s component system is built on React under the hood, meaning components designed in Framer can be exported as actual React components that engineering teams use directly. For design-engineering workflows where the goal is maximum continuity between design and production code, this architecture is a significant practical advantage over tools that output only specifications or static assets.

Framer AI can generate entire page layouts from text prompts, create component variants, write copy, and suggest design improvements. The AI generation quality for landing pages and marketing sites is genuinely impressive, producing layouts that require less revision than generic templates. For teams that build marketing sites and product landing pages as part of their design scope, Framer is increasingly the right primary tool.

• Production-quality prototypes: Variables, logic, physics animations, and scroll effects, indistinguishable from real products
• No-code website publishing: Design to live production website without engineering resources
• React component export: Design components that export as usable React code for engineering teams
• Framer AI: Page layout generation, component creation, and copy writing from text prompts
• CMS integration: Dynamic content from external CMS sources displayed in live Framer sites

Pricing (2026): Free (basic prototyping), Mini at $5/month, Basic at $15/month, Pro at $30/month. Site plans for publishing start at $10/month.

5. InVision

Best for: Teams using InVision Freehand for collaborative whiteboarding and design review

InVision pioneered clickable prototyping for the design industry and shaped how design teams present and review work with stakeholders for years. In 2026, the landscape has shifted, InVision’s core prototyping functionality has been largely superseded by Figma and Framer, and the company sunset the original InVision prototyping platform in 2024. What remains, and what continues to be genuinely valuable, is InVision Freehand, the collaborative whiteboard and design review tool.

InVision Freehand serves as a visual collaboration space for design teams, a place for wireframing sessions, design critique workshops, journey mapping, and stakeholder presentations that combines whiteboard freedom with structured design review capabilities. Sticky notes, sketching tools, voting, and timer features make it particularly useful for design thinking workshops and sprint facilitation.

The design review workflow in Freehand allows designers to present work, collect feedback directly on design elements, track approval status, and maintain a record of design decisions over time. For teams that need documented design history and structured stakeholder sign-off processes, this workflow has real operational value that less structured tools don’t provide.

InVision’s trajectory has been challenging, the company went through significant restructuring and its core product was discontinued. Teams evaluating InVision should do so specifically for Freehand’s collaborative capabilities rather than as a general design tool investment.

• Freehand whiteboard: Flexible visual collaboration space for workshops and design thinking
• Design critique tools: Structured feedback collection with design element annotation
• Approval workflows: Tracked sign-off process for design reviews with stakeholders
• Workshop facilitation: Built-in timers, voting, and activity templates for design sprints
• Cross-tool integration: Connect with Figma, Jira, and other tools in the design workflow

Pricing (2026): Free plan available; Team at $4.95/user/month; Enterprise (custom).

6. Zeplin

Best for: Teams that need a dedicated design-to-engineering handoff workflow separate from their design tool

Zeplin is the specialized design handoff platform, a tool whose sole purpose is bridging the gap between design files and the engineering teams that implement them. While Figma’s Dev Mode has reduced the necessity of a separate handoff tool for many teams, Zeplin continues to offer deeper workflow features: organized component documentation, project-level style guides generated automatically from designs, connected component links to Storybook, and a structured comment system specifically designed for design-engineering communication.

The platform’s styleguide feature automatically extracts all colors, text styles, spacing values, and components from connected design files and presents them in a searchable, organized reference that engineers can consult without opening the design tool. This extraction process happens automatically as designs update, keeping the styleguide current without manual maintenance.

Zeplin’s Connected Components feature links design components in Zeplin to their corresponding code components in Storybook, GitHub, or custom URLs. When an engineer inspects a design element in Zeplin, they see a direct link to the corresponding code implementation, eliminating the time spent searching for which code component corresponds to which design element in a large component library.

For teams with large design systems and significant engineering teams, the structured handoff workflow in Zeplin adds value even alongside Figma Dev Mode. For smaller teams or teams earlier in their design system maturity, Figma Dev Mode is likely sufficient without the additional tool overhead.

• Auto-generated styleguides: Colors, typography, spacing, and components extracted automatically from design files
• Connected Components: Link design components to their code equivalents in Storybook or GitHub
• Figma and Sketch integration: Direct sync from design files with automatic updates
• Engineering annotations: Design-to-engineering comment system separate from general design feedback
• Dashboard: Project-level overview of design status and engineering implementation progress

Pricing (2026): Free (1 project, 2 editors), Growing at $12/month, Organization at $18/editor/month, Enterprise (custom).

7. Axure RP

Best for: Enterprise UX teams building complex functional prototypes with conditional logic and data

Axure RP occupies a unique niche in the product design tool landscape, it is the most powerful wireframing and prototyping tool available for complex enterprise software, functional applications, and products with sophisticated user flows that simpler tools cannot adequately represent. Where Figma excels at visual design fidelity, Axure excels at behavioral fidelity, prototypes that respond to user input, remember state across pages, process conditional logic, and present data dynamically.

Axure’s interaction system allows designers to build prototypes that behave more like real software than like design mockups. Variables store user input and carry it across pages. Conditional logic branches show different content based on what a user has done. Dynamic panels layer multiple states on a single element, triggered by user interactions. Repeater widgets display and filter sets of data dynamically. Together, these capabilities allow UX teams to prototype complex enterprise workflows, multi-step forms, data tables with sorting and filtering, role-based access UI, that stakeholders can interact with as if the product existed.

Adaptive views in Axure allow a single design to define different layouts for desktop, tablet, and mobile breakpoints, with shared interactions that apply consistently across all views. This is particularly valuable for enterprise applications with complex responsive requirements where the experience changes significantly across devices.

Axure’s documentation capabilities, annotations, specifications exported as HTML or Word, and embedded notes, make it a complete UX deliverable tool for teams that produce formal specification documents as part of their workflow. This makes Axure particularly prevalent in agencies, large enterprises, and government digital projects where formal documentation is a project requirement.

• Conditional logic: If/else interaction logic that responds to user input and state across pages
• Variables and data: Store and manipulate user input to create stateful, data-aware prototypes
• Dynamic panels: Multi-state elements that layer content triggered by interactions
• Adaptive views: Single design with defined responsive breakpoints sharing the same interaction logic
• Specification export: Detailed HTML and Word documentation of all interactions and annotations

Pricing (2026): Pro at $29/user/month, Team at $49/user/month. Cloud hosting and on-premise options available.

8. Balsamiq

Best for: Early-stage wireframing and concept exploration where fidelity should stay low intentionally

Balsamiq is the low-fidelity wireframing tool, deliberately sketchy, intentionally rough, and designed to keep conversations at the concept level rather than drifting into pixel-level feedback before the fundamental structure of a product has been validated. Its hand-drawn aesthetic is a design choice, not a limitation. When wireframes look “done,” stakeholders give polish feedback instead of structural feedback. When wireframes look like sketches, feedback naturally stays at the right level of abstraction.

The Balsamiq component library covers every standard UI element, navigation bars, buttons, forms, tables, modals, tabs, accordions, all in the same sketchy style that communicates structure without conveying design decisions. Drag, resize, and connect these components to produce wireframes in minutes rather than hours, at a speed that enables rapid iteration during early discovery phases when ideas need to be explored and discarded quickly.

Balsamiq Wireframes (the cloud version) allows real-time collaboration and commenting directly on wireframes, making it practical for distributed teams running design thinking sessions and stakeholder workshops. The export options, PDF, PNG, and interactive HTML clickable prototypes, provide enough fidelity to conduct usability research on core user flows without investing in high-fidelity design work prematurely.

Balsamiq is not the right tool once a product moves into visual design. But at the earliest stages of product definition, when the goal is to explore five different navigation architectures in a single afternoon, its speed and deliberate low-fidelity approach have no parallel in the current tool landscape.

• Sketchy aesthetic: Intentionally low-fidelity style that keeps feedback at the structural level
• Drag-and-drop UI library: Comprehensive standard UI element library in consistent sketch style
• Rapid iteration: Build and revise wireframes at the speed of ideation
• Collaborative editing: Real-time co-editing and commenting in Balsamiq Cloud
• Clickable prototypes: Link screens for simple interactive wireframe walkthroughs

Pricing (2026): Balsamiq Cloud from $9/month (2 projects), $49/month (20 projects), $199/month (unlimited). Desktop version at $89 one-time.

9. Whimsical

Best for: Designers and product managers who need wireframes, flowcharts, and mind maps in one fast tool

Whimsical is a visual collaboration workspace that combines wireframes, flowcharts, mind maps, sticky notes, and docs in a single, fast, opinionated tool. Where most design tools specialize deeply in one category, Whimsical’s breadth covers the complete range of visual artifacts that product teams produce during discovery and planning, from the initial mind map of a problem space through the user flow diagram that defines the navigation architecture to the wireframe that communicates the information hierarchy of each screen.

Whimsical’s wireframing capability prioritizes speed over depth. A small library of clean, modern UI components, combined with smart snap-to-grid alignment and instantly resizable containers, allows designers to produce presentable wireframes faster than any other tool in this category. The visual aesthetic is clean enough to share with stakeholders without apology while clearly communicating that these are wireframes, not final designs.

The flowchart capability deserves special mention. Whimsical’s automatic connector routing, which intelligently adjusts arrow paths as shapes are moved, makes complex user flow diagrams and system architecture diagrams significantly faster to build and maintain than in general-purpose diagramming tools. Connecting shapes, labeling flows, and adding conditional branch labels is intuitive enough that product managers can build user flow diagrams independently, without needing a designer to produce diagrams for every planning document.

Whimsical AI can generate mind maps, flowcharts, and wireframe suggestions from text descriptions, useful for bootstrapping a planning session with a structural starting point that the team can then refine collaboratively.

• Multi-format workspace: Wireframes, flowcharts, mind maps, sticky notes, and docs in one canvas
• Fast wireframing: Clean UI component library with smart alignment for rapid low-fi design
• Smart connectors: Auto-routing arrows that adjust intelligently as diagram elements move
• Whimsical AI: Generate mind maps, flowcharts, and wireframe starting points from prompts
• Real-time collaboration: Multiplayer editing with comments and cursor presence

Pricing (2026): Free (4 boards), Pro at $10/user/month, Organization at $20/user/month.

10. Marvel

Best for: Rapid prototyping, user testing, and teams that want design and research in one platform

Marvel is an all-in-one design platform covering wireframing, prototyping, and user testing, a combination that makes it particularly efficient for teams running lean design processes where the same person who designs the wireframe also runs the usability test on it. The integrated user testing capability eliminates the tool-switching overhead of separate design and research platforms for early-stage concept validation.

Marvel’s prototyping is screen-based and click-through, ideal for demonstrating user flows, testing navigation architecture, and validating information hierarchy without the complexity of full interaction design. Transitions, overlays, and gesture interactions cover the most common mobile and web interaction patterns without requiring knowledge of interaction design software. A product manager or UX researcher with no design tool experience can build testable prototypes in Marvel within an hour.

The user testing module allows designers to create test tasks, recruit participants from Marvel’s built-in tester panel or share links with their own users, and collect recorded sessions with click-tracking and heatmaps. For quick concept validation research, five participants, one user flow, results in 48 hours, this integrated approach is faster than running Figma prototypes through a separate testing platform.

• Integrated user testing: Design, prototype, and test with participants in one platform
• Click-through prototyping: Screen-based interactive prototypes without design tool expertise required
• Tester panel: Built-in participant recruitment for usability tests
• Heatmaps: Click and interaction heatmaps from prototype testing sessions
• Handoff specs: CSS and measurement specs for engineering teams

Pricing (2026): Free (1 project), Pro at $12/user/month, Team at $42/month (5 users), Enterprise (custom).

11. Principle

Best for: Designers crafting detailed micro-interaction animations and mobile app transition prototypes

Principle is a Mac-based animation and interaction design tool focused on the detailed micro-interactions and transitions that define the feel of a great product. Where Figma handles visual structure and component layout, Principle handles motion, the spring physics of a bottom sheet drawer, the easing curve of a card expanding to full screen, the stagger timing of list items loading in sequence. These details are what separate products that feel polished from those that feel generic.

Principle’s driver-based animation system connects UI element properties, position, size, opacity, color, to user interaction events (drag, scroll, tap) with direct, manipulable curves that designers adjust visually rather than numerically. This approach makes it intuitive to create interactions that feel natural because they respond proportionally to user input rather than jumping through fixed states.

The tool’s workflow typically sits between Figma (where the visual design is created) and the production codebase, a designer imports artboards from Sketch or Figma, adds interaction and animation logic in Principle, and exports prototype videos or shareable interactive prototypes for engineering teams to reference when implementing the actual animations. This handoff is the primary value: engineering teams implement from Principle prototypes with far fewer clarification cycles than from static specifications with written animation descriptions.

• Physics-based animation: Spring, gravity, and easing controls that create natural-feeling motion
• Driver animations: Tie animation properties directly to drag, scroll, and interaction input
• Figma and Sketch import: Import design artboards as animation starting points
• Video export: Export prototype recordings for sharing with engineers and stakeholders
• Component system: Reusable animated components for consistency across prototype screens

Pricing (2026): $129 one-time purchase (Mac only). Free trial available.

12. Rive

Best for: Teams building interactive animations that run natively in production apps and websites

Rive is a next-generation animation platform that produces interactive, state-machine-driven animations that run directly in production applications, not as exported video files or GIF animations, but as actual animation logic rendered by a lightweight runtime available for web, iOS, Android, Flutter, React Native, and more. This fundamental difference makes Rive the tool for teams that want animations which respond to real user interactions, data, and application state in production.

Rive’s State Machine is its core innovation. Designers define animation states (idle, hover, loading, success, error) and the transitions between them, including input variables (boolean, number, trigger) that the application code drives at runtime. The result is an animation that the engineering team can control programmatically, changing a boolean variable in code transitions the animation from “loading” to “success” state automatically, without any additional animation code. This dramatically reduces the engineering overhead of implementing complex interactive animations.

The visual editor combines vector drawing tools with a timeline animation system, allowing designers to draw, rig, and animate characters, icons, UI elements, and data visualizations in one place. Mesh deformation, bone-based rigging, and path animation make it suitable for character animation alongside UI motion, the same tool that animates a loading spinner can animate a full character mascot for a mobile game’s tutorial.

For design teams at companies where animated illustrations and micro-interactions are part of the product’s brand identity, fintech apps, consumer products, games, educational tools, Rive has become the standard tool for bridging the gap between the motion designer’s vision and the production implementation.

• State Machine: Define animation states and transitions controlled by application code at runtime
• Production runtime: Lightweight runtimes for web, iOS, Android, Flutter, and React Native
• Input variables: Connect animation state to application data and user events programmatically
• Vector editor + timeline: Draw, rig, and animate in a unified design environment
• Community assets: Large library of ready-to-use, customizable Rive animations

Pricing (2026): Free (community plan), Indie at $19/month, Team at $45/month, Enterprise (custom).

13. Spline

Best for: Product and web designers adding 3D elements to UI and marketing experiences

Spline has democratized 3D design for product and web designers who have no background in traditional 3D software. Its browser-based interface and design-focused toolset make creating 3D objects, scenes, and interactive experiences accessible without the steep learning curve of tools like Blender or Cinema 4D. For UI designers who want to add 3D elements to landing pages, app stores, hero sections, and product marketing materials, Spline delivers in hours what would previously require a dedicated 3D artist.

Spline’s 3D scenes can be embedded directly in websites as interactive WebGL experiences, users can rotate, zoom, and interact with 3D objects in real time on a web page. The embedding process requires a single code snippet and no 3D programming knowledge. This capability has become standard for high-end SaaS product marketing sites, where interactive 3D product renders have largely replaced static hero images as the way companies showcase software products.

Physics simulation, particle effects, and procedural geometry tools expand Spline’s creative range beyond static 3D modeling into dynamic, animated scenes. A spinning 3D logo with particle effects, a floating isometric product UI, or a procedurally animated background scene are all achievable within Spline without external rendering tools or lengthy export/import workflows.

Spline AI can generate 3D objects and scenes from text descriptions, useful for quickly visualizing a concept or generating starting assets that are then refined manually. The AI-generated quality is sufficient for exploration and ideation, though production-level assets typically require manual refinement.

• 3D design for non-3D designers: Accessible 3D modeling, materials, and lighting without traditional 3D tool expertise
• WebGL embedding: Interactive 3D scenes embed on websites with a single code snippet
• Physics and particles: Dynamic simulation and particle effects for animated 3D scenes
• Spline AI: Generate 3D objects and scenes from text descriptions
• Figma integration: Export 3D assets to PNG/SVG for use in Figma designs

Pricing (2026): Free (basic features, Spline watermark on exports), Pro at $9/month, Teams at $22/user/month.

14. Webflow

Best for: Designers who want full control over production web design without writing code

Webflow is the most powerful no-code web design tool available, a visual canvas that generates clean, production-quality HTML and CSS rather than proprietary markup that requires the Webflow platform to render. Designers with strong CSS knowledge can achieve essentially any web layout in Webflow that they could achieve by hand-coding, without the actual code writing. Designers without CSS expertise can build sophisticated layouts using Webflow’s visual tools and learn production web design constraints organically as they work.

Webflow’s CMS is one of its most powerful features for design teams building content-driven sites. Designers define content types (blog posts, case studies, team members, products) with custom fields, design the template once, and the CMS renders the template with real content across all instances automatically. A portfolio site, a marketing blog, or a documentation hub built in Webflow requires no back-end engineering work, the designer controls the entire experience from visual layout to content architecture.

Webflow Interactions is an advanced animation system that ties CSS animations and JavaScript behaviors to scroll events, load events, hover events, and custom triggers, all configured visually without code. The animations Webflow produces are clean, semantic, and performant, not the bloated JavaScript that many no-code tools generate. For designers building scroll-driven storytelling experiences, product pages with progressive disclosure, or marketing sites with sophisticated entrance animations, Webflow’s interaction system is the benchmark.

• Visual CSS editor: Full control over production HTML/CSS without writing code
• Webflow CMS: Custom content types with designer-controlled templates for dynamic content sites
• Interactions: Scroll-driven and event-triggered animations built visually, outputting clean code
• E-commerce: Visual design of product pages, carts, and checkout flows with Webflow Commerce
• Hosting: Global CDN hosting built in, design and deploy from the same platform

Pricing (2026): Starter (free), Basic at $14/month, CMS at $23/month, Business at $39/month, Enterprise (custom).

15. Canva

Best for: Non-designers creating on-brand assets and design teams managing marketing collateral at scale

Canva has grown from a simple template-based graphic design tool into a comprehensive visual communication platform used by over 170 million people globally. For product design teams, Canva’s primary value is in non-designer empowerment, allowing marketing teams, product managers, customer success, and leadership to create on-brand visual assets independently without requiring designer bandwidth for every presentation, social graphic, or sales deck.

Canva’s Brand Kit feature is its most important capability for design teams. Logos, brand colors, brand fonts, and pre-approved photo libraries can be locked in a Brand Kit that all team members draw from, ensuring visual consistency even when non-designers are creating content. Brand templates, custom-designed by the design team and locked to prevent structural modification, allow non-designers to update content within approved layouts without breaking the brand’s visual identity.

Canva’s AI features are extensive and genuinely capable: Magic Design generates complete design compositions from uploaded images and text prompts; Magic Write creates and expands copy; Background Remover and Magic Eraser handle basic image editing tasks; and Magic Media generates AI images and videos directly within the canvas. For teams creating large volumes of marketing content, these AI features provide meaningful acceleration.

Canva for Teams includes collaboration features, brand kit management, approval workflows, and content scheduling for social media, making it a practical content operations tool rather than just a design tool. For small and medium businesses without dedicated design teams, Canva provides a level of visual quality that would otherwise require significant professional design investment.

• Brand Kit: Centralized brand assets ensuring visual consistency across all team-created content
• Brand templates: Designer-created locked templates non-designers populate without breaking layouts
• Magic AI suite: Magic Design, Magic Write, Background Remover, and AI image/video generation
• 170M+ asset library: Photos, illustrations, icons, videos, and audio for any content need
• Content planner: Social media scheduling directly from Canva with multi-platform publishing

Pricing (2026): Free (generous features), Pro at $15/month, Teams at $10/person/month (minimum 5 people), Enterprise (custom).

16. Adobe Illustrator

Best for: Vector illustration, icon design, logo creation, and print-ready design work

Adobe Illustrator remains the definitive vector graphics tool, the industry standard for creating logos, icons, illustrations, infographics, and any design work where scalable vector output is the requirement. While Figma and Sketch have absorbed much of the UI design workflow that used to involve Illustrator, vector illustration and brand identity work at the level of precision that Illustrator delivers has no real equivalent in newer tools.

Illustrator’s pen tool, anchor point handling, and path manipulation capabilities are the most refined in the industry. Complex organic shapes, precise bezier curves, and detailed vector illustration work is faster and more controllable in Illustrator than in tools that offer pen tools as secondary features. For designers who produce icon systems, brand illustrations, or marketing artwork as part of their scope, Illustrator remains essential.

The Generative AI features integrated into Illustrator (powered by Adobe Firefly) can generate vector-style imagery from text prompts, recolor artwork based on reference palettes, and expand artboards with AI-generated content that matches the existing artwork’s style. For illustrators and icon designers, these features accelerate the ideation and production phase meaningfully without compromising the precision of the final output.

• Industry-standard vector tools: Pen tool, anchor points, and path operations at the highest precision level
• Adobe Firefly AI: Text-to-vector generation, generative recolor, and contextual artwork expansion
• Variable fonts: Complete OpenType variable font support for typographic design
• Creative Cloud Libraries: Share assets across Photoshop, XD, InDesign, and other CC apps
• Print and screen output: Production-quality output for both print (CMYK, spot color) and digital

Pricing (2026): Illustrator single app at $22.99/month; Creative Cloud All Apps at $54.99/month.

17. Affinity Designer

Best for: Professional vector and raster design without subscription costs

Affinity Designer from Serif is the most capable alternative to Adobe Illustrator available, offering professional-grade vector and raster design tools with a permanent one-time license, a compelling alternative for designers who object to subscription pricing or who work in environments where software purchasing models matter. The feature set covers 95% of Illustrator’s use cases for most product designers, at a fraction of the total cost of ownership.

Affinity Designer’s dual vector and raster persona system (switching between vector drawing mode and pixel editing mode within the same application) eliminates the Illustrator/Photoshop context switch for many common tasks, designing a vector icon that requires raster texture treatment, for example, can happen in a single document without exporting between applications.

Version 2, released in 2022 and continuously updated, introduced significant performance improvements, batch export presets, improved symbol management, and enhanced text handling. The application’s performance, particularly on Apple Silicon Macs, is noticeably faster than Illustrator for complex files, making it a compelling practical choice independent of the pricing argument.

• One-time purchase: No subscription, pay once, use forever with free updates within version
• Vector + raster personas: Switch between vector drawing and pixel editing in one document
• Apple Silicon optimized: Native performance on M-series Macs, faster than Illustrator on equivalent files
• Non-destructive effects: Layer effects, adjustments, and filters applied non-destructively
• Batch export: Export multiple artboards or assets in multiple formats simultaneously

Pricing (2026): Affinity Designer 2 at $69.99 one-time (Mac, Windows, iPad). Affinity Universal License (all apps) at $164.99.

18. Procreate

Best for: Digital illustration, concept art, and brand illustration created on iPad

Procreate is the dominant digital painting and illustration app for iPad, the tool that has made the Apple Pencil + iPad Pro combination a serious professional illustration setup used by designers at studios, agencies, and product companies worldwide. For product designers who produce hand-drawn UI concepts, character illustrations, brand mascots, or custom artwork as part of their scope, Procreate provides a natural, high-fidelity drawing experience that no desktop tool replicates.

The brush engine in Procreate is exceptionally responsive, thousands of brushes covering everything from graphite pencil simulation to oil paint to calligraphy, all responding to Apple Pencil pressure, tilt, and velocity with latency low enough to feel analog. This responsiveness is the defining quality that makes Procreate feel like drawing on paper rather than drawing on a screen.

Procreate’s time-lapse recording captures the entire creation process as a video, useful for creating process content for social media and for sharing creative process with clients. The export options cover PSD (with layer preservation), PDF, TIFF, animated GIF, and MP4, making it straightforward to move Procreate work into design and production workflows.

Animation Assist in Procreate allows frame-by-frame animation on the iPad canvas, useful for producing animated sticker concepts, character animation for mobile apps, and illustrated social media content. While not a replacement for dedicated animation tools, it’s sufficient for concept-level animation work.

• Professional brush engine: Responsive pressure and tilt-sensitive brushes that feel like analog drawing tools
• iPad + Apple Pencil native: Optimized for the Apple Pencil experience on iPad Pro
• Time-lapse recording: Automatic recording of the complete creation process
• PSD export: Export layered files directly to Photoshop and other design tools
• Animation Assist: Frame-by-frame animation for concept-level motion work

Pricing (2026): $12.99 one-time purchase (iPad only). Procreate Pocket (iPhone) at $4.99.

19. Maze

Best for: Product teams running rapid, unmoderated usability tests on Figma and prototype designs

Maze is a rapid usability testing platform that connects directly to Figma (and other design tools) to run unmoderated tests with real users and return quantitative results within hours. Its core value proposition is speed, the ability to validate a design decision with real user data before a sprint ends, rather than after the feature has been built. For product teams practicing continuous discovery, Maze provides the infrastructure for running usability tests as a regular practice rather than an occasional milestone activity.

Maze’s Figma integration is seamless, import a prototype directly from Figma, define the test tasks and questions, set the participant criteria, and launch. Participants interact with the Figma prototype as normal while Maze records their click paths, measures completion rates and time-on-task per screen, identifies misclick hotspots, and captures any verbal feedback from open-ended questions. The results dashboard presents these metrics in clear visualizations that are immediately actionable for design revisions.

The platform’s panel, access to thousands of participants across demographics, industries, and roles, means designers don’t need to recruit their own users for every test. A quick concept test with five participants can be configured and launched in 30 minutes and return results within 24 hours. This speed makes user research a practical input to everyday design decisions rather than a gate at the end of a design phase.

• Figma integration: Import prototypes directly, no export, no manual linking
• Unmoderated testing: Run tests asynchronously with real users at any hour
• Quantitative metrics: Task completion, time-on-task, misclick rate, and path analysis per screen
• Participant panel: Access to thousands of participants by demographic and role
• Heatmaps: Aggregated click heatmaps showing where users click across each test screen

Pricing (2026): Free (limited responses/month), Starter at $99/month, Team at $249/month, Organization (custom).

20. UserTesting

Best for: Enterprise UX teams running qualitative user research at scale with video feedback

UserTesting is the leading platform for qualitative user research, video recordings of real users completing tasks on your product or prototype, with screen recordings, facial expressions (via webcam), and think-aloud commentary captured simultaneously. Where Maze excels at quantitative unmoderated testing, UserTesting excels at the qualitative depth that reveals why users behave the way they do, the confusion, the workarounds, the unexpected interpretations that numbers alone cannot surface.

UserTesting’s contributor network provides access to over one million participants who have been screened for quality. Advanced targeting filters allow research teams to recruit participants matching extremely specific criteria, industry, job function, company size, software usage patterns, geographic region, household income, and dozens of other attributes, meaning the participants in a study reflect the actual target user population rather than a convenience sample.

The platform’s AI-powered analysis features significantly reduce the time between data collection and insight generation. AI can automatically transcribe sessions, identify recurring themes across multiple sessions, flag emotionally significant moments (based on sentiment analysis), and generate summary findings documents from a full round of research. What would previously take days of manual note-taking and theme analysis can now be completed in hours.

For enterprise organizations where user research needs to scale across multiple product teams, UserTesting’s workspace structure, research template library, and insight sharing features make it practical to run dozens of studies simultaneously while maintaining institutional knowledge of accumulated research findings.

• Video research: Screen recording, webcam, and think-aloud capture in a single session
• 1M+ contributor panel: Highly screened participants with advanced demographic and behavioral targeting
• AI analysis: Automatic transcription, theme identification, and sentiment-flagged moment detection
• Moderated and unmoderated: Both live moderated sessions and async unmoderated studies
• Insight repository: Centralized storage and search of all research findings across the organization

Pricing (2026): Continuous plan from $449/month; Volume plan from $1,200/month; Enterprise (custom). Pricing based on sessions per month.

21. Hotjar

Best for: UX and product teams analyzing real user behavior on live websites and apps

Hotjar is the most widely used behavioral analytics platform for understanding how real users interact with live products, not prototypes, but production websites and applications with actual traffic. While usability testing platforms like Maze and UserTesting study how users interact with designs in controlled conditions, Hotjar studies how users actually behave when using the real product on their own terms, revealing the behavioral patterns that controlled research misses.

Heatmaps are Hotjar’s flagship feature, aggregated visualizations of where users click, move their mouse, and scroll on any given page. Click heatmaps identify which elements draw attention and interaction; scroll maps reveal how far down pages users read before dropping off; move maps show mouse movement patterns that often correlate with visual attention. Together these visualizations make invisible user behavior legible without any individual session viewing.

Session recordings capture individual user journeys through a site, with mouse movement, clicks, scrolling, and form interactions all recorded. For identifying specific usability problems, recordings where users struggle, hesitate, or take unexpected paths are far more diagnostic than aggregate metrics alone. Hotjar’s AI-powered highlight reel automatically surfaces the most insightful moments from recordings, saving the hours of manual session review that would otherwise be required.

Surveys and feedback widgets complete Hotjar’s research toolkit, pop-up surveys at key moments in the user journey collect the contextual motivation data that behavioral analytics can’t provide. Why did a user abandon checkout? Why did someone leave the pricing page without converting? Brief, targeted micro-surveys capture this context at the moment it’s most accurate.

• Heatmaps: Click, move, and scroll heatmaps aggregated across all real user sessions
• Session recordings: Individual user journey recordings with AI-powered highlight detection
• Surveys and feedback: In-product micro-surveys at behavioral trigger points
• Funnels: Drop-off analysis across multi-step user flows on live products
• Hotjar AI: Automatic insight summaries from heatmaps, recordings, and survey responses

Pricing (2026): Free (limited sessions), Plus at $32/month, Business at $80/month, Scale at $171/month.

22. LottieFiles

Best for: Teams using Lottie animations across web and mobile apps

LottieFiles is the ecosystem platform for Lottie animations, the JSON-based animation format originally created by Airbnb that allows designers to export animations from After Effects and have them rendered at full quality in iOS, Android, and web apps at a fraction of the file size of equivalent video files. In 2026, Lottie has become the standard animation format for product design, and LottieFiles is the hub where designers create, store, discover, and deploy them.

LottieFiles’ online editor allows designers to create and modify animations directly in the browser, adjusting colors, speeds, and layer properties of existing Lottie files without After Effects, and creating simple animations from the editor interface without any animation software. For teams that need to customize existing animations (changing brand colors on a loading animation, adjusting timing on an onboarding illustration) this capability eliminates the round-trip back to After Effects for minor changes.

The community marketplace contains thousands of free and premium Lottie animations covering every common use case, loading states, success confirmations, empty states, onboarding illustrations, and interactive button animations. For teams without dedicated motion designers, the marketplace provides production-quality animations that can be customized to brand colors and integrated into products in minutes.

LottieFiles’ developer tools, a WordPress plugin, React component, Android/iOS libraries, and a CDN hosting option, make integration straightforward regardless of the engineering stack, completing the workflow from designer creation to production deployment without requiring animation expertise from the engineering team.

• Online editor: Edit Lottie animation colors, timing, and layers without After Effects
• Animation marketplace: Thousands of free and premium animations for common product design use cases
• After Effects plugin: Export animations directly from After Effects to Lottie JSON format
• Developer SDKs: React, iOS, Android, Flutter, and Web libraries for production integration
• CDN hosting: Host and serve Lottie animations via CDN with a single URL

Pricing (2026): Free (10 private files, community access), Pro at $39/year, Team at $99/year, Enterprise (custom).

23. Abstract

Best for: Sketch-based design teams needing version control and design file management

Abstract is the version control platform for design files, applying Git-inspired branching and merging concepts to Sketch files to solve the collaboration and versioning problems that plague large design teams working on shared components and complex file structures. For teams with multiple designers working on the same Sketch library simultaneously, Abstract provides the structure to work in parallel branches and merge changes systematically rather than through manual file coordination.

The branching model in Abstract allows a designer to create a branch from the master design file, make changes to a component in isolation, preview the diff of their changes against master, and request a design review before merging. This workflow mirrors how engineering teams use Git for code, bringing the same rigor to design file management that has long existed in software development.

Abstract’s project organization, collections of files organized by project with full version history, branch management, and review threads, provides audit capability that cloud-synced design tools don’t. Every version of every file is preserved, every design decision has an associated review thread, and every merge is documented. For organizations where design governance and compliance require this level of documentation, Abstract fills a gap that Figma’s simpler version history doesn’t address.

• Git-style branching: Create design branches, review diffs, and merge changes systematically
• Design reviews: Structured review workflow with comments, approval, and merge controls
• Full version history: Every version of every file preserved with complete change documentation
• Project organization: Multi-file project structure with team access controls
• Sketch integration: Works natively with Sketch files, not applicable to Figma workflows

Pricing (2026): Starter at $9/contributor/month, Business at $15/contributor/month, Enterprise (custom).

24. Zeroheight

Best for: Design teams documenting and publishing living design system documentation

Zeroheight is the leading platform for building and maintaining design system documentation, the living, interactive styleguide that communicates design standards, component usage guidelines, accessibility requirements, and design principles to the engineers, designers, and product managers who use the design system daily. Where Figma stores the design system’s components and Storybook documents the engineering implementation, Zeroheight bridges the two by pulling component previews from both and presenting them alongside human-written documentation in a unified, searchable reference site.

The Figma and Storybook integrations are Zeroheight’s core value. Component previews are pulled live from Figma, ensuring the documentation always shows the current version of each component rather than static screenshots that quickly become outdated. Simultaneously, code examples and interactive component demos are pulled from Storybook, showing designers and product managers what the component actually looks like in the browser, not just in a design tool. This dual-source documentation eliminates the most common design system failure mode: documentation that contradicts both the design tool and the production implementation.

Zeroheight’s customizable pages allow design system teams to structure documentation exactly as their organization needs, component reference pages, pattern libraries, design principles, accessibility guidelines, getting started guides, and changelog pages can all be created and organized in a site that matches the team’s specific documentation needs rather than a generic template structure.

• Figma integration: Live component previews pulled directly from Figma files, always current
• Storybook integration: Embedded interactive code components alongside design documentation
• Custom documentation pages: Flexible page builder for principles, patterns, and guidelines
• Search: Full-text search across all design system documentation
• Access controls: Public, organization-wide, or team-specific visibility for different documentation sections

Pricing (2026): Starter (free, 1 styleguide), Pro at $149/month (3 styleguides), Enterprise (custom).

25. Storybook

Best for: Engineering teams building and documenting UI component libraries alongside design systems

Storybook is the open-source tool for building, testing, and documenting UI components in isolation, the engineering counterpart to design system tools like Figma and Zeroheight. It creates a development environment where each component in a codebase is developed, previewed, and documented independently, separate from the application that uses it. For design-engineering teams building shared component libraries, Storybook is the infrastructure that makes component reuse systematic rather than ad hoc.

Each component in Storybook has “stories”, individual examples that demonstrate the component in different states, with different props, in different contexts. A Button component has stories for its primary, secondary, danger, disabled, and loading states. A Card component has stories with different content lengths, with and without images, in light and dark modes. These stories serve as living documentation that never drifts from the actual implementation because they render the real components directly.

Storybook’s integration with design tools has deepened significantly. The Figma plugin for Storybook allows teams to link Storybook stories to Figma components, creating a two-way reference that makes navigating between design and code trivial for anyone on the team. When a designer inspects a component in Figma, they can jump directly to the Storybook story. When an engineer implements a component in Storybook, they can reference the Figma design in the same interface.

Chromatic, the visual testing service built on Storybook, automatically detects visual regressions by comparing Storybook stories across deployments, catching unintended visual changes to components before they reach production. For organizations where visual consistency is a quality requirement, this automated visual testing closes the loop between design specifications and production implementation monitoring.

• Component isolation: Develop and document each UI component independently outside the application
• Stories system: Multiple state examples per component serving as living, always-accurate documentation
• Figma integration: Link Storybook stories to Figma components for two-way design-code navigation
• Visual testing (Chromatic): Automated visual regression detection across deployments
• Addons ecosystem: Accessibility testing, responsive viewport, theming, and hundreds of other addons

Pricing (2026): Storybook is free and open-source. Chromatic (visual testing) free up to 5,000 snapshots/month; Team at $149/month; Enterprise (custom).

Tools by Category

The right tool depends on what stage of design you are working in

Full Comparison Table: 25 Best Product Design Tools

Frequently Asked Questions

Do I need all these tools, or can one tool replace the rest?

No single tool covers the entire product design workflow effectively. The realistic minimum stack for a professional product designer in 2026 is: a primary UI design and collaboration tool (Figma for most teams), a user testing tool (Maze for quick validation, UserTesting for deeper research), and access to behavioral analytics on live products (Hotjar). If animation is part of your scope, add Rive or Principle. If you are building a design system, add Zeroheight. Most teams operate with four to six tools in their daily stack, the key is choosing deliberately rather than accumulating every tool that appears in a newsletter.

Is Figma really worth the price for a solo designer?

For most solo designers, yes. Figma’s free plan allows up to three projects with full editing capabilities, sufficient for freelancers with a manageable number of concurrent client projects. If you regularly work on more than three projects simultaneously, the Professional plan at $15/month is the most cost-effective professional design tool available given its capabilities. The alternatives, Sketch at $10/month (Mac only, less collaboration), Affinity Designer at $70 one-time (no collaboration, no prototyping), serve different specific needs rather than offering genuinely equivalent value for a connected design workflow.

What is the difference between Maze and UserTesting?

Maze is primarily quantitative and fast, it runs unmoderated tests on prototypes or live products, collects click data and completion rates from many participants simultaneously, and returns results within hours. UserTesting is primarily qualitative and deeper, it captures video recordings of individual users completing tasks, with verbal think-aloud commentary that reveals intent and confusion beyond what click data shows. The two are complementary: use Maze to quickly validate that a design works with a large sample, use UserTesting to understand why it works or doesn’t with a smaller sample. Budget-conscious teams typically start with Maze and add UserTesting when the qualitative depth justifies the cost.

Should design teams learn Storybook?

Designers do not need to learn to write Storybook stories, that is engineering’s responsibility. Designers do benefit from understanding how to navigate and use Storybook to review implemented components, check that implementation matches the design spec, and use the Figma plugin to link design components to code components. The interface is simple enough for any designer to use for review and reference without understanding the underlying React or framework code. Design leads and design system owners should have a deeper understanding of how Storybook works structurally, since the design-engineering handoff quality depends on the connection between Figma components and Storybook stories being well-maintained.

Is Webflow only for designers with coding knowledge?

No, Webflow is accessible to designers without coding knowledge, though some CSS understanding accelerates the learning curve. The visual tools cover flexbox layouts, grid systems, animations, and responsive breakpoints through a visual interface that teaches CSS concepts through interaction rather than requiring prior knowledge. Most designers become independently productive in Webflow within one to two weeks of focused use. Understanding CSS concepts, box model, positioning, flexbox vs. grid, makes complex layouts much faster to build, so designers who invest in this foundational knowledge get significantly more out of Webflow than those who treat it as a pure drag-and-drop tool.

Build Your Design Stack Intentionally

The best design stack is the one that removes friction between your ideas and the people they are meant for. Start with Figma for UI design, add a testing tool, and build from there based on what your team actually needs, not what the next newsletter says you should be using. For WordPress-powered community platforms, membership sites, and BuddyPress social networks, explore what Wbcom Designs has built.

Explore Wbcom Designs Plugins